Legal Opinion

Reed v. Stone

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 28, 1959No. 1060 and 6-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIGNOUX, District Judge.

These are diversity actions to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of separate automobile collisions. In each action the plaintiff was a passenger in a car owned and operated by her husband; the defendant was the driver of the other car involved in the collision; and the defendant has joined the plaintiff’s husband as third-party defendant. Each third-party complaint sufficiently alleges that the husband was negligent, and seeks contribution from him, as a joint tortfeasor, of one-half of the amount of any damages for which the defendant may be found…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hobbs v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  4. Yellow Cab Co. of D. C., Inc. v. DreslinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LaChance v. Service Trucking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  2. Rodgers v. GalindoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bedard v. GreeneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API