Legal Opinion

Bedard v. Greene

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 31, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Promptly after filing his answer in this slander action, defendant Abbott Greene filed a third-party complaint asserting a right of contribution against two persons who had successively repeated to others the defamatory statement allegedly made by Greene. Under Rule 12(b)(6), M.R.Civ.P., the Superior Court without elaboration dismissed defendant Greene’s third-party complaint. Since Greene is charged with having intentionally published a slander and since we adhere to the universal common law rule that contribution.is not available to an intentional tortfeasor, we deny…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Packard v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. Roberts v. American Chain & Cable Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  4. Bedell v. ReaganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  5. Hobbs v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Carey v. Mt. Desert Island HospitalDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
  3. Estate of Dresser v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Burleigh v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  5. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API