Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1975No. Civ. 36576PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARKEET, J. *

This case involves two issues on appeal: (1) Whether an intervention by the state after hearing but before judgment is proper under section 387 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (2) Whether civil penalties assessed under the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act are to be awarded to the state or to the party which maintains the action?

By an initiative measure in the general election held November 7, 1972, the voters approved Proposition 20 enacting the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (Coastal Act) Public Resources Code section 27000 et seq. The following…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sawyer v. BarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. San Diego Coast Regional Commission v. See the Sea, LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Northern California Psychiatric Society v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. Superior Court (Good)California Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. StringhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API