Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Barbour

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1956No. Civ. 21407PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

On this appeal plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of section 773 of the Vehicle Code which, before its amendment in 1955, read:

“To reimburse the General Fund for amounts appropriated therefrom for driver training pursuant to Section 5153.6 of the Education Code, 1 on and after January 1, 1954, there shall be levied a penalty assessment on all offenses involving a violation of a section of this code or of a city or county ordinance, relating to the operation of motor vehicles, except offenses relating to parking or registration, in the following amounts:
“ (1) Jail sentence…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Beamon v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API