Legal Opinion
United States v. Lane Motor Co. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1952No. 4461_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
These are libel actions, the first for the forfeiture of a truck and the second for the forfeiture of an automobile. The complaint in the first case charged that Guy Walter Matthews owned the truck; that it was used to transport raw materials, utensils, and vessels to the point where a distillery owned by Matthews was operated; that the materials, utensils, and vessels were to be used in the illegal manufacture and concealment of spirituous liquors; and that the truck was also used in transporting to and from the distillery men engaged to manufacture distilled spirits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Manufacturers Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Charles D. Kaier Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- United States v. One Ford Coach, 1949 ModelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. One 1972 Datsun, Vehicle Identification No. LB1100355950District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
- United States v. Lane Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Dennis Sell and Edward Konder v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- State v. AlawayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.