United States v. One Ford Coach, 1949 Model
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The United States appeals from the judgment of the District Court that a 1949 Ford automobile had not been used to carry on the business of a liquor dealer without payment of the special tax thereon in violation of Section 3253, or in the removal, deposit or concealment of nontax paid distilled spirits in violation of Section 3321, and therefore was not subject to forfeiture under Sections 3116 or 3321 of the Internal Revenue Code.
On two occasions a man desiring to purchase nontax paid liquor was driven in a taxicab from Gastonia to a house in the mountain section of Gaston County, North…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. One Ford TruckDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1932
- United States v. One 1942 Pontiac Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1944
- United States v. One Dodge SedanDistrict Court, D. California · 1928
- United States v. One 1941 Buick Coach AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- T. B. Wingo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Lane Motor Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. One 1955 Mercury SedanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. One 1952 Lincoln Sedan, Motor No. 52lp22535h (Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile, Intervenor)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. One Hudson Hornet SedanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.