Legal Opinion
United States v. Lane Motor Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 9, 1953No. 499PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Per curiam
In this proceeding, the Government sought the forfeiture of an automobile and of a truck under the provisions of § 3116 of the Internal Revenue Code in the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. That Section allows the seizure and forfeiture of property “intended for use in violating” the alcohol tax laws, as well as property “which has been so used.” The respondent, alleging an interest in the two vehicles, contested the forfeitures.
The district judge found the facts to be that the truck and automobile had each been used by the operator of an illegal distillery to drive a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Lane Motor Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. One 1950 Ford Half-Ton Pickup Automobile Truck, Motor No. 9-8rc-289459Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. One 1948 Plymouth Sedan, EtcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. One 1974 Cadillac Eldorado Sedan, Serial No. 6l47s4q407966Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. One 1972 Datsun, Vehicle Identification No. LB1100355950District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
- Will Parks Clay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.