Legal Opinion

Kemmerle v. Kemmerle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1951No. 38,343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

This was a divorce case. The present appeal is from an order of the district court finding defendant guilty of contempt for his failure to pay the balance of alimony, attorneys’ fees and costs allowed plaintiff. Counsel for appellant raises two points: First, the decree for the payment of these items is not such that a contempt proceeding will lie to enforce payment. Second, that the evidence upon the hearing for contempt was insufficient to support the order made from which the appeal is taken.

The pertinent facts may be stated briefly as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. State v. DentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Hummer v. LamphearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Springer v. PrebleNevada Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Dozier v. DozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Brayfield v. BrayfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API