Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1909No. 15,916PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from Greenwood district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Eva G. Scott obtained a divorce from Chasteen F. Scott. In her petition she had asked to be allowed as alimony a tract of land situated in the county. The parties stipulated, however, that the husband should pay the wife $250, which he did, and that she should also be allowed $20 a month for the maintenance of their two children, if she should be awarded their custody. The decree so far as here important read:

“That the property rights of said parties be settled as per the terms of said stipulation; that plaintiff be "barred from any further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Blankenship v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Haynes v. HaynesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Hoffman v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Preston v. PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. McGill v. McGillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Hagemann v. PinskaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API