Legal Opinion

Brayfield v. Brayfield

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 4, 1953No. 38,881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment finding Ralph S. Brayfield guilty of indirect contempt.

On July 9, 1951, in an action instituted in the district court of Sedgwick County, under the provisions of G. S. 1949, 60-1516, Mary Brayfield, after a contested trial, was awarded a quarter section of real estate, then in her possession, as her separate and sole property and recovered judgment against her husband, Ralph S. Brayfield, for the sum of $1,787.50. In the same decree the husband, as defendant, was directed to pay the plaintiff the sum of $90…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haynes v. HaynesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Mathey v. MatheySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Osman v. OsmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Rumsey v. RumseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dozier v. DozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Rossen v. RossenOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Roush v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Badley v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hensley v. Board of Education of Unified School District No. 443Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API