Legal Opinion

Staldter v. City of Huntington

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1899No. 18,678PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erom the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Appellant sued the city of Huntington, and Keefer and Railwood, in the Huntington Circuit Court, to recover damages on account of personal injuries sustained by reason of an explosion of dynamite while appellant was at work upon the construction of a sewer in said city. The defendant-Railwood, it appears, was not served with process, and the action was prosecuted only against the city of Huntington and Keefer. The cause was transferred to the Kosciusko *355Circuit Court and, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court, upon the separate request of each of the defendants, instructed the jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Creed v. . HartmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. FarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Leader v. BowleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Bennett v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API