Legal Opinion

J. Richardson & Co. v. Noble

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1906No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by J. Richardson & Company against George W. Noble and Walter A. Noble, copartners as G. W. Noble & Son, for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff for less than the amount claimed, and it brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiffs are manufacturers of shoes. In the spring of 1903 they sold the defendants, who are retail shoe merchants, by sample, a bill-of 108 pairs of “ladies patent leather tipped shoes,” 84 pairs at $2.10, the remaining 24 pairs at $1.50 per pair, amounting in all to $212.40, upon which the defendants paid $100 September 10, 1903. The shoes were delivered at defendants’ store between May 27th and May 30th. The defendants commenced to sell the shoes “in two or three days or a week after their arrival.” The defendants claim to have sold all of the $1.50 shoes and 56 pairs of the $2.10…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watkins v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Grieb v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Roethke v. Philip Best Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Sinker, Davis & Co. v. DigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bolt v. FriederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Griffin-Middleton v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. McCormick v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Board of Supervisors v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Crowley Bros. v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API