Legal Opinion
Sinker, Davis & Co. v. Diggins
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Wexford. (Ramsdell, J., presiding.) ' Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, ■and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
On September 8, 1885, a contract was closed between Mr. D. E. McIntyre, of Cadillac, this State, and the plaintiff, a corporation residing and doing business at Indianapolis, Indiana, under the following letters:
“ Cadillac, Mich., Sept. 5, 1885.
“Messrs. Sinker, Davis & Co.,
“Indianapolis, Ind.
“Gents: I have concluded to purchase one of your ■Gold Dust mills, 8 ft. wheels, as shown me by your Mr. Davis. I think you had better send one of your men here at once to look my mill over, so I may know just what ■changes to make in order to have everything ready to put your mill in when it comes. You…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Crisp v. State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Ilins v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Applied Data Processing, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
- J. Richardson & Co. v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- WÄRTSILÄ NSD NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. Hill International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.