Bolt v. Friederick
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This suit was brought to recover a balance of salary. Defendant hired plaintiff as a salesman of musical instruments for six months at the rate of $1200 per year, to which was to be added the amount of any reasonable traveling expenses while away from Grand Rapids on defendant’s business.
At the end of five months the parties by mutual consent terminated the engagement, and agreed upon the balance due, which, however, was not paid. When this suit was brought, defendant claimed that plaintiff had in some cases departed from the line of his instructions and that he was entitled to allowance for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Fleming v. Niagara C. P.New York Supreme Court · 1834
- Roethke v. Philip Best Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by6 opinions
- Watkins v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- J. Richardson & Co. v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Hinchman v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Detroit River Transit Co. v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Pungs v. American Brake-Beam Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.