Legal Opinion

Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 2002No. 86,479PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Employee appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer in the employee’s retaliatory discharge action.

Dixon Industries, Inc. (Dixon) instituted a drug testing policy in 1988 for the stated purpose of providing employees a safe and productive work place and providing customers with products of the highest quality. Under Dixon’s drug testing policy, all prospective new hires were required to submit to preemployment alcohol and drug testing. Dixon also required employees to consent to alcohol and drug testing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Alvin Rea, Gordon Keepers, Robert Reynolds, Barbara Weightman, and Barbara Van Den Arend v. Martin Marietta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Morriss v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Proctor v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Foster v. AlliedSignal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API