Legal Opinion
Wann v. Lemieux
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 18, 1994No. 13746PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The respondent appeals from the decision of the trial court setting aside an order of a family support magistrate and remanding the matter for further proceedings. The petitioner has moved to dismiss the appeal claiming that we lack subject matter jurisdiction because the order from which the respondent appealed is not a final judgment. We agree.
The petitioner, a Pennsylvania resident, filed an action under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, General Statutes § 46b-180 et seq., seeking both an adjudication of paternity and support for her minor child born August 6, 1987.1 At…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dacey v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Harvey v. WilcoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Bretemps v. Strona, No. Fa-96-0620924 (Jan. 24, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Harvey v. Wilcox, No. Fa99-0118516 (Jul. 6, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000