Brannigan v. Usitalo
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
On interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court {Manias, J.), pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 9, the plaintiff, Rory Brannigan, challenges the constitutionality of RSA 508:4-d (Supp. 1990), which limits damages recoverable for non-economic loss in a personal injury action to $875,000. The superior court approved for transfer, and we accepted, the following questions:
“(1) Does the statute violate the Plaintiff’s equal protection rights as guaranteed by Part I, Article 12 of the New Hampshire Constitution?(2) Does the statute violate the Plaintiff’s right to due process of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Lucas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Carey v. LovettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.