Legal Opinion

Smith v. Beesley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 12, 2011No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Judge.

¶ 1 This case involves a land use dispute concerning a driveway built by the appellees Peter Beesley and Carol Booth (hereinafter “Beesley”) over a drainage easement in the Kohl’s Tonto Creek Ranch subdivision. Appellant Otis Smith, who owned a lot adjacent to the easement, filed an amended complaint against Beesley asserting claims of trespass, nuisance, and unlawful alteration of a watercourse pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-3613. After protracted proceedings regarding Smith’s request for injunctive relief, the court held a bench trial on Smith’s claims. It then entered…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Arizona Board of Regents v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sedona Grand, LLC v. City of SedonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Todd Underwood v. Thomas Wilczynski and Dana Wilczynski Janet A. Bewley...Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API