Smith v. Beesley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Judge.
¶ 1 This case involves a land use dispute concerning a driveway built by the appellees Peter Beesley and Carol Booth (hereinafter “Beesley”) over a drainage easement in the Kohl’s Tonto Creek Ranch subdivision. Appellant Otis Smith, who owned a lot adjacent to the easement, filed an amended complaint against Beesley asserting claims of trespass, nuisance, and unlawful alteration of a watercourse pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-3613. After protracted proceedings regarding Smith’s request for injunctive relief, the court held a bench trial on Smith’s claims. It then entered…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Arizona Board of Regents v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Sedona Grand, LLC v. City of SedonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Todd Underwood v. Thomas Wilczynski and Dana Wilczynski Janet A. Bewley...Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021