Sedona Grand, LLC v. City of Sedona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 This ease requires us to determine whether a municipal land use ordinance is exempt as a matter of law from the strictures of the Private Property Rights Protection Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-1131 through 12-1138 (the “Act”), whenever the law’s stated purpose is to promote public health and safety. We hold that a mere declaration of purpose is insufficient to invoke the exemption, and that a government entity seeking to avoid paying compensation must present evidence that its principal purpose in passing a land use law is one that qualifies for exemption under the Act. We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gersten v. Sun Pain Management, P.L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Passmore v. McCarverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Villasenor v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. GearCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Risas Holdings v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.