Legal Opinion

Sedona Grand, LLC v. City of Sedona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 7, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 10-0782PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 This ease requires us to determine whether a municipal land use ordinance is exempt as a matter of law from the strictures of the Private Property Rights Protection Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-1131 through 12-1138 (the “Act”), whenever the law’s stated purpose is to promote public health and safety. We hold that a mere declaration of purpose is insufficient to invoke the exemption, and that a government entity seeking to avoid paying compensation must present evidence that its principal purpose in passing a land use law is one that qualifies for exemption under the Act. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gersten v. Sun Pain Management, P.L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Passmore v. McCarverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Villasenor v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. GearCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Risas Holdings v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API