State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Planned Industrial Expansion Authority
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PETITION FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF QUO WARRANTO
SEILER, Judge.
Original action in the nature of quo warranto filed in this court pursuant to Art. V., Sec. 4, Mo.Const.1945, V.A.M.S. Relator maintains the Planned Industrial Expansion Law, enacted in 1967, under which the respondent Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of St. Louis is claiming to exist and act, is unconstitutional in numerous respects, and hence said authority should be ousted from asserted rights, privileges and franchises it cannot constitutionally exercise. The city of St. Louis is a co-respondent and Kansas City, which also…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- City of Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Bader Realty & Invesment Co. v. St. Louis Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People Ex Rel. City of Canton v. CrouchIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Menorah Medical Center v. Health & Educational Facilities AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Callier v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Jardon v. Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- People Ex Rel. City of Urbana v. PaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.