Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. Hedrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 29, 1922PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPiigbee, J.

This is an information in the nature of a quo toarranto by the Attorney-General at the relation of James T. Bradshaw, charging that the respondent usurped, intruded into and unlawfully holds the of‘fice of warehouse commissioner, and praying judgment of ouster against the respondent. Respondent waived the issue of the writ, entered his appearance in this action, and filed his return, in which he pleads the action of the Governor removing relator from office, and his appointment, confirmation and qualification* Relator filed his reply, pleading that Section 5995, Revised Statutes 1919, under…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Wilson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. State v. JulowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Budd v. HancockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Edwards v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Voss v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Jardon v. Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. McKaig v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API