Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Jardon v. Industrial Development Authority

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 12, 1978No. 60594PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Chief Justice.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto and this court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 4 of Art. V of our Constitution.

The facts are not in controversy since both parties have stipulated as to the essential factual elements.

The original information was filed by the Attorney General at the relation of Claude E. Jardon, Jr., who resides in Jasper County, Missouri, and is a resident taxpayer and duly qualified registered voter in the City of Joplin.

Respondent is a corporation created pursuant to §§ 349.010-349.100, RSMo Supp. 1977, 1 hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Menorah Medical Center v. Health & Educational Facilities AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Common Cause v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. St. Louis County Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API