Legal Opinion
W.N. v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided June 6, 2018No. CV–17–717PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
II. Standard of Review and Relevant Law
Our review is directed not to the decision of the circuit court, but rather to the decision of the administrative agency. Burton v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. , 2015 Ark. App. 701, 478 S.W.3d 221. Review of administrative agency decisions, by both the circuit court and the appellate courts, is limited in scope. Id. The standard of review to be used by both the circuit court and the appellate court is whether there is substantial evidence to support the agency's findings. Id.
An appellate court sitting in review of a finding of an administrative agency…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arkansas State Police Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Short v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. SittonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Teston v. Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Terry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Snyder v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Steve A. Baldwin, as Representative of the Joan A. Baldwin Family Trust, Agreement; The Steve A. Baldwin Family Trust; The Alton Baldwin Family, Trust Agreement; And Baldwin Enterprises v. Arkansas Department Of, TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
- Arkansas Local Police and Fire Retirement System v. Michael PayneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024