Legal Opinion

Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. Sitton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 2004No. 03-414PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

The Arkansas Tobacco Control Board stice. decision of the Pulaski County Circuit Court finding that in the absence of the ATCB adopting regulations defining the statutory terms “trade discounts” and “rebate,” the Unfair Cigarette Sales Act (UCSA) prohibition against rebates is void for vagueness as applied in this case. We affirm the circuit court and hold that a person of ordinary intelligence is not on fair notice of whether payments to Dodge Stores (Dodge) 1 were permitted “trade discounts” or prohibited “rebates.” Therefore, the UCSA is unconstitutional as applied in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Linder v. LinderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Ghegan & Ghegan, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Morrison v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Davis v. ParhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Gallas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Archer v. Sigma Tau Gamma Alpha Epsilon, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Reed v. Arvis Harper Bail Bonds, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API