Legal Opinion
Teston v. Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 7, 2005No. 04-420PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
This appeal was certified to this court by the court of appeals in order to address apparent conflicts between the statutes governing the practice of chiropractic and the practice of physical therapy. Appellant Michael Teston appeals from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court affirming a decision by the Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners that Teston practiced chiropractic without a license.
Teston is a licensed physical therapist. From January 2001 through April 2001, Teston treated Katherine Fryar after she had been injured as a result of a car accident.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wright v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Arkansas State Police Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- BD. OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hanks v. SneedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Austin v. Centerpoint Energy ArklaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- C.C.B. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Fryar v. Touchstone Physical Therapy, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.