Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 14, 1993No. 13-90-347-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of theft. The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ probation. On original submission, appellant complained of insufficient evidence and jury misconduct. While sufficient evidence exists to uphold the conviction, this Court abated the appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial concerning jury misconduct. We limited the scope of the hearing to address specific grounds, which appellant narrowed into two claims. Appellant alleged that a juror knew one of the alleged victims but failed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Tollett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Baldonado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bath v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. State v. St. ClairHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API