Baldonado v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
Appellant, a schoolteacher, was charged in two separate indictments with the offense of indecency with a child. The cases were consolidated and after a jury finding of guilt in each case, the court assessed punishment in each case at five years confinement probated for ten years.
In six points of error, the appellant contends he is entitled to a new trial due to jury misconduct, the admission of extraneous offenses, and the admission of testimony from a State’s witness who was not disclosed prior to trial. We affirm the convictions.
Appellant’s first four points of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Dugard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Booker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- Saenz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Goldstein v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.