Legal Opinion

Saenz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 13, 1998No. 13-97-217-CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA Justice.

A jury found appellant, Randy Saenz, guilty of murder and assessed his punishment at thirty years imprisonment. At the time of the offense, appellant was fourteen years old. By four points of error, appellant challenges his certification to stand trial as an adult, argues that no evidence corroborates the testimony of an accomplice witness and no evidence establishes a culpable mental state, and complains of jury misconduct. We affirm.

Background

At approximately 10:00 p.m. on May 21, 1996, seventeen-year-old Gilbert Flores, six teen-year-old Raymond Montalvo, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Meyer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Martins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  4. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Noel Galvan Cerna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API