Matter of Custody of Peal
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The sole issue for our review is whether Judge Wood abused his discretion in concluding that a change in the custody of Stacy Brian Peal was legally warranted in 1980. We hold that the able and experienced district judge did not exceed the bounds of his discretion in this regard and therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. In so doing, we affirm the sound reasoning expounded by Judge Clark in his dissent at the Court of Appeals. See 54 N.C. App. at 569-70, 284 S.E. 2d at 350-51.
Unfortunately, child custody disputes are often hotly-contested, bitter affairs in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Phelps v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Crutchley v. CrutchleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Shipman v. ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Crutchley v. CrutchleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.