Legal Opinion

In Re McLean

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1999No. COA98-1457PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Respondent mother contends that (I) the evidence and findings of fact were insufficient to support the conclusion of the trial court that Tamara Beth McLean is a neglected juvenile. She also contends, as does respondent father, that (II) the trial court erred in ordering DSS not to attempt to reunite her with Tamara unless she disassociates herself from respondent father. Respondent father argues that (III) the trial court was demonstrably prejudiced against respondents in this case, and that (IV) the trial court also erred in attempting to retain jurisdiction to hear future…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Matter of NicholsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Wolfe v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In re C.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. In re P.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. In Re PMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In re J.A.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  5. In re N.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API