Legal Opinion
Gore v. Kressner (In Re Kressner)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1994No. 19-10322PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiff Hilda Gore (“Plaintiff’), the executrix of the estate of Bernard Gore (“Gore”), has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), made applicable to this proceeding by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7056(a), for an order granting partial summary judgment against the debtor. The plaintiffs motion, which alleges fraud or defalcation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4), relates to the within adversary proceeding which she has commenced to have this Court declare the plaintiffs claim to be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,935 Vance L. Ragsdale v. John Frederick Haller AKA Fred HallerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barristers Abstract Corp. v. Caulfield (In Re Caulfield)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Gore v. Kressner (In Re Kressner)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Houston v. Capps (In Re Capps)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995