Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Coffman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

— This action was commenced by the appellant against the appellees to enjoin the commission of waste. Ann Coffman, by the will of her late husband, was the owner of a life estate in the lands on which the alleged waste was committed. Dawson was the owner in fee of two undivided thirds of the remainder. On the trial, the court instructed the jury as follows:

“"Waste is whatever does a lasting damage to the inheritance, aud tends to the permanent loss of the owner in fee, or to destroy or lessen the value of the inheritance. So what might be for the good and convenience of the tenant *221for life,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horton v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Barnard v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Elliott v. WoodwardIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Robinson v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Horne v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Musselman v. MusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Peery v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API