Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Woodward

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Daviess Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by Woodward, as holder, against the appellants, as acceptors of a certain bill of exchange. Trial; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

A new trial was moved on the ground, amongst other things, that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. We are of opinion that the evidence tends to establish every point material to a recovery.

An instruction is complained of as erroneous. No valid exception was taken to the instniction. The Court, at the request of the plaintiff, gave instructions embracing eight distinct and separately numbered propositions, the most of which…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnard v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Garrigus v. BurnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Sloo v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bowman v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Dawson v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. City of Lafayette v. LarsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Dunham v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Taylor v. SchradskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API