Horne v. Williams
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Delaware Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that the appellee, who was the plaintiff, employed Horne and Slack as surgeons to reduce and cure her then fractured thighbone for a certain reward, etc. And, having accepted and entered upon such employment, it became and was their duty to set and adjust the fractured limb in a skillful, careful, and diligent manner. Yet they, not regarding their duty, did not skillfully set and adjust the same; but on the contrary, etc., conducted their employment in an improper, unskillful, and negligent manner, to the great injury of the plaintiff. 'Wherefore she is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robinson v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Ephraims v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
- Ludwig v. LeonardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Western Assurance Co. v. McAlpinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Dawson v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Studabaker. v. FaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.