Legal Opinion

Piccioli v. City of Phx.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 2, 2019No. 1 CA-CV 16-0690PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Judge:

¶1 This opinion addresses the enforceability and constitutionality of an administrative regulation that partially ended a longstanding practice of including payouts for accrued sick leave when calculating an employee's pension benefits under the City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement Plan ("Plan"). Because Phoenix voters never took any affirmative act to authorize this practice, we hold the regulation does not violate common-law or constitutional protections applicable to public employee pensions.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Phoenix is a home rule city organized under Article 13, Section 2 of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. Cramton v. Grabbagreen Franchising LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  3. Frank Piccioli v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API