Legal Opinion
Lane v. Random House, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 26, 1995No. Civ.A. 93-2564 RCLPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Defendant Random House, Inc. has moved for dismissal of Plaintiff Mark Lane’s complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Alternatively, Random House has moved for summary judgment under Fed .R.Civ.P. 56. Upon consideration of the filings of counsel and the relevant law, Random House’s motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED on all counts.
Random House has also requested costs and attorneys’ fees. As prevailing party, Random House is entitled to costs as specified by Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and Local Rule 214. The request for attorneys’ fees is…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Joe Dickerson & Associates, LLC v. DittmarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Abbas v. Foreign Policy Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Frye v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Keimer v. Buena Vista Books, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.