Legal Opinion

Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2004No. B160586PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

In marketing its films, a motion picture studio advertised films by falsely portraying a person as a film critic for a newspaper and attributing to him laudatory reviews about the films. Certain film viewers filed this lawsuit under the California unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), the false advertising law (id., § 17500 et seq.) and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) seeking injunctive relief, restitution and disgorgement.

The studio filed a special motion to strike the complaint, claiming it was a strategic lawsuit against…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hilton v. Hallmark CardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Filmon.Com. Inc. v. Doubleverify Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Graffiti Protective Coatings, Inc. v. City of Pico RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. New. Net, Inc. v. LavasoftDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  5. D.C. v. R.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API