Legal Opinion
Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City of Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2002No. 00-1516PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
In this dispute concerning the bidding process for the provision of pay telephone service in the lock-up facilities of the City of Detroit (“City”), Plaintiffs Appellants Michigan Paytel Joint Venture (“MPJV”), Michigan Paytel, Inc. (“MP”), and Noah, Inc. (“Noah”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their antitrust and civil rights claims and grant of summary judgment in favor of the City, Michigan Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech (“Ameritech”), and Charles Boyce (“Boyce”). For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.
I.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Alexander v. CareSourceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Regents of the University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County, Kentucky, Fiscal Court Don Salyers Masonry, Inc. Don Salyers John Doe 2Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Wysong Corp. v. M.I. IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Spurlock v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.