Roof v. Chattanooga Wood Split Pulley Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, C. J.:
The appellee, a corporation under the laws of the State of Tennessee, instituted a suit of replevin, for the use of the First National Bank of Chattanooga, against appellant to recover possession of personal property described as “1 E. & B. Holmes Flooring Machine,” which it is alleged he wrongfully withheld from plaintiff. The value of the machine is fixed at $850, and the affidavit states that it had not been taken for any tax assessment or fine levied by virtue of any law of the State, nor seized under any execution or attachment against the goods and chattels of plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Campbell Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- Smith v. MoynihanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. ArthurhultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Eureka Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Cunningham v. MilnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Palmer v. RS Evans, Jacksonville, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Voges Motor Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.