Legal Opinion

State v. Higgenbotham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 17, 1998No. 77,620PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This case concerns the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument, district court rulings during trial, and imposition of the hard 40 sentence.

Defendant Chester L. Higgenbotham, alias MatthewS. Murphy, appeals his convictions and sentence following a jury trial for premeditated first-degree murder, K.S.A. 21-3401, and kidnapping, K.S.A. 21-3420. Higgenbotham received a hard 40 sentence for the murder conviction and 49 months, consecutive to the hard 40, on the kidnapping charge. Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 22-3601(b)(1), (premeditated…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API