Legal Opinion

State v. Huddleston

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 14, 2014No. 106,273PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

In this direct appeal, Sharon Huddleston presents two arguments for reversing her conviction of premeditated first-*942degree murder. We reject both arguments. As to her first issue, although we agree the two prosecutors who made arguments to the jury misstated the law by suggesting premeditation could occur after a homicidal act, we conclude it is not reasonably probable that these misstatements affected the outcome of the trial given the strong evidence of premeditation, the jury instructions, and the prosecutors’ correct statements of the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. People v. ArcherdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API