Legal Opinion
Rosenbaum's Ex'ors v. Seddon
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 20, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, rendered April 30, 1895, in an action of assumpsit wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error were the defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
Riely,. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is the sequel of the case of Seddon v. Rosenbaum, reported in 85 Va. 928.
Upon the first trial of the case the plaintiff moved the court to give to the jury the following instruction:
“If the jury believe from the evidence that on or about the 11th day of March, 1886, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement by which the defendant agreed to buy 250 *576shares of the Richmond and Danville Railroad stock and sell the same to the plaintiff at $96 per share, the plaintiff to take the same at the end of three years from the day oí the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J. B. Campbell's ex'ors v. A. C. Campbell's ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
- Seddon v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- Holleran v. MeiselSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- New York Life Insurance v. ClemmittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
- Findlay v. Trigg's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Chappell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Henrikson v. Swedish Baptist Mission SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Virginian Railway Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Kemp v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.