Legal Opinion

Seddon v. Rosenbaum

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 28, 1889PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to judgment of circuit court of Richmond city, rendered July 13th, 188Y, in the action of T. Seddon, who is the plaintiff in error, against S. M. Rosenbaum. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

This action was assumpsit upon a contract by the defendant to sell the plaintiff two hundred and fifty shares of the capital stock of the Richmond & Danville Railroad Company at the *929price of $96 per share. The contract was reduced to writing, but was not signed by the party sought to be charged, and is as follows: “S. M. R. [the defendant] to buy 250 shs. R. & D. at 80, and sell the same to T. Seddon at the end of 3 years at 96. Stock may be called at 96 at any time before expiration of 3 yrs.” There was a demurrer by the defendant, which was overruled, and his plea setting up the statute of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. McPherson v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Wiggins v. KeizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lee's Adm'r v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  4. Radio Corporation v. Cable Radio Tube CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Blue Valley Creamery Co. v. Consolidated Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API