Legal Opinion
Cordero-Sacks v. Housing Authority
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 2011No. B217191PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles appeals from the judgment following a jury trial in favor of its former employee, Ada Cordero-Sacks. We affirm the judgment as modified.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Applying the usual rules of appellate review, we state the evidence in the light most favorable to the judgment. (Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth Lakes (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 435, 462-463 [120 Cal.Rptr.3d 797].) Appellant is the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (the Authority). Respondent is Ada Cordero-Sacks, a licensed attorney…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scott Teutscher v. Riverside Sheriffs AssnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Scott Teutscher v. Riverside Sheriffs AssnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Cash v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- McCluskey v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020