Legal Opinion
Scott Teutscher v. Riverside Sheriffs Assn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2016No. 13-56411, 13-56659PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, Jr.
OPINION
FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to examine the limits on a district court’s authority to award front pay and reinstatement as equitable remedies for a retaliatory .discharge after a plaintiff has already sought and been awarded by a jury front pay damages to compensate for the same harm. Plaintiff-Appellee Scott Teutscher went to trial against his former employer, Riverside Sheriffs’ Association (“RSA”), on retaliatory discharge claims under both state law and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001— 1461…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- R. Alexander Acosta v. Scott BrainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Ronald Barranco v. 3D Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Wooten v. BNSF Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2019
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.