Legal Opinion

Hockett v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 8, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

Appellee was arrested by appellant James Ledwith, a Tucson police officer, on May 24, 1980, and charged with disorderly conduct. The charges were subsequently dismissed upon motion of the state, and appellee filed the present action against the Ledwiths and the City of Tucson seeking compensatory and punitive damages for *319false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of appellee and awarded $15,000 in compensatory damages but no punitive damages. This appeal was taken from the trial court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Murphy v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Watzek v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hockett v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API