Legal Opinion

Corporation Commission v. Consolidated Stage Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1945No. Civil No. 4754PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaPRADE, J.

The appellee is a corporation doing business as a motor carrier of passengers and property for hire under a certificate of convenience and necessity issued by the appellant Arizona Corporation Commission. See Chapter 66, Article 5, Regulation of Public Highway Transportation, Sections 66-501 to 66-533, Arizona Code Annotated 1939. A Mr. Hood, owning a share of stock in the appellee corporation, filed an application with the commission for permission to transfer or assign his share of stock and “his interest” in the corporation to a Mr. Fix. The applicant shareholder proceeded upon the theory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. L. Singer & Sons v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Detroit & M. Ry. Co. v. Boyne City, G. & A. R.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
  4. Menderson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Industrial Commission v. Arizona Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin Truck Line, Inc. v. Alabama Tank Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Riffle v. Robert L. Parker CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, NulleArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cracchiolo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Corporation Commission v. Southern Pac. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API