Legal Opinion

Strauss v. A. L. Randall Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1983No. Civ. 68513PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Plaintiff, Edgar Strauss, Jr. (Strauss) appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered following an order sustaining the general demurrer of defendant A. L. Randall Co., Inc. (Randall) to the first count of the complaint without leave to amend.

In considering an appeal from a judgment of dismissal, entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to a complaint, a reviewing court must regard the allegations as true and assume that plaintiff can prove all of the facts as alleged. (Dale v. City of Mountain View (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 101, 105 [127 Cal.Rptr. 520].)

Strauss entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stevenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API