Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 19, 2005No. 03-4234PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
In 1995, the Procter & Gamble Company and the Procter & Gamble Distributing Company (hereinafter jointly referred to in the singular as P & G) filed this action against the Amway Corporation (Amway) and certain of its distributors asserting claims under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and Utah common law. The district court’s subject matter jurisdiction was based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1831, 1332, and 1367. In March 1999, the district court granted summary judgment to defendants on some of P & G’s claims and dismissed the remaining claims. P & G appealed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Mobley v. MccormickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Bixler v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Niemi v. LasshoferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.