Metro. Loan Ass'n v. Esche
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This action was brought to recover money misappropriated by Otto Esche, while acting as secretary of the plaintiff, and is based upon a bond given to secure the faithful performance of his duties. The defendants, Charles Meinecke and Henry ¡Neilsen, were two of the three sureties on the bond. The court below gave judgment against Esche for the full amount claimed, and against Meinecke and Neilsen for their proportions of that amount.
Meinecke and Neilsen moved for a new trial, and have appealed from the judgment and order denying their motion;
The facts shown by the record are as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by13 opinions
- Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Crane v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Panhandle Lumber Co. v. RancourIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.